Configuration traceability
Complete configuration traceability for every airframe, every engine, every avionics build — current, historic, and reconciled at the tail number.
AS · Aviation & Aerospace
Astra.
iQuantile for Aviation & Aerospace
In a sector where failure is not measured in revenue, the gap between systems is unacceptable. Astra keeps complete configuration traceability for every airframe, every engine, every avionics build. Field failures resolve in days, not months.
For OEMs, MROs, Tier 1 suppliers, and aerospace primes carrying airworthiness, ITAR, and SAF obligations on the same airframe.
Scroll
The problem
Configuration audits in quarters. Field root cause in months.
Your configuration audit takes a quarter to complete. Your field failure analysis takes months to root-cause. Your supply chain visibility ends at the tier-one supplier, while the part that failed came from a tier-three plant nobody had a name for.
Cyber-physical security and information security are managed by different teams with different tools. Sustainable aviation fuel reporting is an estimate that no longer satisfies the customer or the regulator.
The solution
One configuration, one supply graph, one set of controls.
Field failure resolution
Field failures trace back through every supplier, every test, every design decision — in days, not months. The trace is the artifact.
Tier 1–N supplier graph
Supply chain visibility past the tier-one supplier. Tier-three plants, batch certificates, and material lineage queryable from the same ledger.
Unified security controls
Cyber-physical and information security live under one set of controls. DO-326A, EASA Part-IS, and NIST 800-171 enforced at the platform level.
SAF & lifecycle emissions
Sustainable aviation fuel, lifecycle emissions, and weight reduction become measured outcomes — not narrative goals.
ITAR-grade segregation
ITAR-controlled data segregation enforced at the platform level, not by policy reminder. Export-controlled programs run on the same backbone.
How Telos works in aviation and aerospace
An example.
A part fails in a fleet on a Thursday. Telos traces it back through the airworthiness records, the supplier batch certificates, the simulation data from the original design verification, the IEC test records, and the configuration revision history.
The affected fleet is identified to the tail number. The supplemental type certificate impact is calculated. The corrective action is drafted, with the regulatory notification to the FAA and EASA pre-populated. The same trace updates the supplier scorecard and the reliability prediction model for the next platform.
Telos
Airworthiness
Supplier batch
Sim + IEC tests
Config revision
MRO records
Tail-number scope
STC impact
FAA / EASA notices
Field failureAirworthinessSupplier batchSim + IEC testsTail-number scopeFAA/EASA notice
Compliance frameworks active in this industry pack
Pre-configured for the regulators that matter.
12
Controls mapped across every airworthiness surface.
01
Airworthiness & quality
05 controls
AS9100AS9120FAA PMAEASA Part 21SAE AS6171
02
Cyber & information security
04 controls
DO-326AEASA Part-ISNIST 800-171TSA aviation security
03
Export & program controls
03 controls
ITAREARCMMC
The return
What changes for the business.
Configuration audit time reduced. Mean time to root cause cut from months to days. Supplier-driven non-conformance rate cut. Verifiable lifecycle emissions data at component level. Regulatory readiness made continuous.
Configuration audit time reduced
Configuration audits compress from a quarter to a working session. The ledger is the audit — evidence assembled continuously, not retrospectively.
Mean time to root cause: days
Field failures trace back through every supplier, every test, every design decision in days, not months. The trace updates the next platform.
Supplier non-conformance cut
Supplier-driven non-conformance rate cut. Tier-three batch lineage queryable from the same ledger that runs the airworthiness file.
Verifiable lifecycle emissions
Lifecycle emissions data at component level. Sustainable aviation fuel, weight reduction, and regulatory readiness made continuous.
The path
Six stages. One continuous arc.
Every Astra deployment moves through the same arc — assessment into framework design, implementation into intelligence, verification into growth. No stage is skipped. No deliverable is declared complete until the outcome is verified on the live fleet.
01Assessment
Configuration · Supply · Airworthiness
Where the configuration ledger stands, what the supplier graph is missing, and what closing the gap looks like in airworthiness terms.
- Configuration, MRO, and supplier diagnostic across instrumented platforms
- PLM, ERP, and quality-system gap analysis with reconciliation cost modeled
- Cost-of-inaction quantified against grounding exposure and audit liability
- Airworthiness, security, and SAF disclosure indicator set with embedded KPIs
- Regulatory mapping (AS9100, FAA PMA, EASA Part 21, DO-326A, ITAR)
- Implementation sequencing tied to certification windows and program cycle
02Framework Design
Airworthiness · Security · Disclosure
Indicators owned by the Chief Engineer and the Head of Quality — signed, not aspirational.
03Implementation
Astra · Agents
We stay embedded until the platform produces verified output, not just integration reports.
- Astra configured across the fleet, ledger live across PLM and MRO
- Function agents deployed across configuration, quality, and supplier
- Change management, engineering training, and shop-floor rollout
- Causal modelling across configuration, supplier, test, and field data
- Prescriptive corrective actions tied to verified airworthiness state
- Continuous learning against the operational ground truth of the fleet
04Intelligence
Telos · Q-Core
Telos reasons across the configuration graph continuously — prescribing the next move, not describing the last one.
05Verification
Conscience · Evidence
Every claim reconciled against AS9100, FAA, EASA, DO-326A, and ITAR before it leaves the operator.
- Audit-grade reconciliation against AS9100, FAA PMA, EASA Part 21, DO-326A
- Component-level lifecycle emissions and SAF assembled per tail number
- Unverified claims blocked at the system level — no airworthiness gap
- SAF programs, corporate travel, and transition finance on verified intensity
- Capital instruments underwritten on operating data, not engineering estimates
- New platforms launched against verified airworthiness and supplier performance
06Growth
Programs · Capital
Verified output unlocks new programs, SAF offtake, and transition finance on verified ledger.
Ready to see Astra?
Demos are tuned to your specific scenario — your fleet, your configuration ledger, your airworthiness obligation. Expect a 14-day intake before the working session.